who are how
claiming excinditin
However, unajie
tho at the P.C.
Case
as
twill refere
they
will
Treat Mi
couścial case
leave
unlar
see that there is some
case on the
meriti.
with regard to the adrivability of having fish. Winlay.
In lock not
Mosing
on
aufro
We have
The winning
mi apprication for Special have. of cons
is desirable that we shaner defeat the application, &
Sui. R.7.
weight
maybe
the idea
Lense
A-
it
who cames peat with their Landsley's
useful in dispellin that this
in any
political case
might be held to be
were the
Committer to suspect
that all the appellants actions
directe Now and ki
had been Supped
in rebellions foremor 7 that that it had
his intention to
had never hear
Convert Yo
1
his
own private
30
But there is also this to be
Considhned
retain
that it
we dont
fir. R.7. for an appli-
leave,
cation for
side
the min
the applica
may, a, if
franted, we
ham is
have heir
the hearing
on the Whore
1.
(i)
Shall
agamist in
al
haring regard I
The fact that it
is
a
Car
7
Exha
dition to China
wh. the Committer my
view with suspicion
(ii) that there is Chame if
Ий
me of a skilful Conused creating
a political
sphere
(mi) The
Questions
atmo-
international
staties y
fost i
I should be inclined
retan bi. R.7.
To Mu
;
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.